A Closer Look at Where Electrical Risk Still Lives
OSHA data is often viewed strictly through a compliance lens, but it tells a much broader story about how electrical incidents actually occur in real work environments. Each year, enforcement trends highlight where safety programs are breaking down, not just on paper, but in day-to-day execution.
As organizations look ahead to 2026, electrical incidents continue to surface during routine tasks, maintenance activities, and system changes. These are not isolated events or rare edge cases. They are recurring patterns that show up across industries, from manufacturing and utilities to data centers and power generation.
Looking at the latest OSHA data helps shift the conversation away from “what’s required” and toward where electrical risk still exists, and why.
What the Data Is Really Showing
OSHA’s most frequently cited standards continue to point toward familiar issues: gaps in energy control, inconsistent application of procedures, and breakdowns during non-routine work. What stands out is not the absence of safety programs, but how often those programs fail to translate cleanly into the field.
Electrical incidents are still occurring during tasks workers perform regularly. Troubleshooting, maintenance, startup, and shutdown activities remain high-risk moments, especially when conditions change or time pressure increases.
The data reinforces a key reality: electrical risk is rarely created by a single failure. It builds when assumptions replace verification and when procedures are treated as flexible rather than essential.
Lockout and Energy Control Remain a Core Challenge
Lockout/Tagout remains one of OSHA’s most frequently cited standards, and recent enforcement data continues to point toward execution challenges during maintenance and troubleshooting activities. The issue is not a lack of understanding of the requirements, but how consistently they are applied when conditions change.
OSHA’s FY 2025 Top 10 list reinforces this trend. Lockout/Tagout (29 CFR 1910.147) recorded 2,177 violations in FY 2025 (preliminary), underscoring how often electrical risk surfaces during non-routine work where time pressure, coordination, and verification matter most.
Common themes seen in electrical incident investigations and citations include:
- Energy control procedures that are too generic for the task
- Isolation points that are not clearly identified or verified
- Communication gaps when multiple teams are involved
- Pressure to restore equipment quickly, leading to skipped steps
In many cases, the issue is not whether a procedure exists, but whether it reflects actual work conditions and is consistently followed when the situation becomes less predictable.
.jpg?width=2296&height=1208&name=PESD%20ebook%20social%20media%202403%20(1).jpg)
Training Exists, but Effectiveness Is the Real Question
Another pattern reinforced by OSHA data is the difference between training completion and training effectiveness. Many organizations can demonstrate that electrical safety training has occurred, yet incidents continue to happen during tasks workers believe they understand.
This disconnect often appears when:
- Training is not aligned with real-world tasks or equipment conditions
- Workers rely on familiarity rather than verification
- Changes to equipment or processes outpace updates to training materials
Effective electrical safety training is becoming more scenario-based and task-specific. It emphasizes hazard recognition, decision-making under changing conditions, and reinforcing verification steps rather than memorization alone.
Verification and Execution Are Under the Microscope
Across enforcement data and incident reviews, one theme appears consistently: verification matters. Electrical incidents frequently trace back to assumptions that equipment was de-energized, isolated, or safe to approach.
OSHA data reinforces where electrical safety execution still needs attention:
- Absence of voltage verification
- Confirmation of isolation points
- Maintaining boundaries during troubleshooting or testing
- Safe re-energization practices after work is complete
As systems become more complex and interconnected, relying on visual indicators or prior knowledge is no longer sufficient. Verification is becoming a defining line between compliant programs and effective ones.
What This Signals Going Into 2026
Taken together, OSHA data points toward a continued shift in expectations. Electrical safety is increasingly evaluated by how well programs perform in real conditions, not just how they are written.
Going into 2026, organizations should expect greater emphasis on:
- Documented, task-specific procedures
- Consistent execution under changing conditions
- Stronger linkage between maintenance, operations, and EHS
- Proof that safety programs are working beyond initial training
Electrical safety is moving closer to operational discipline and reliability, where outcomes matter as much as intent.
Final Thoughts
OSHA data is more than a list of citations. It is a reflection of how electrical work is actually being performed across industries.
Organizations that use these insights to strengthen execution, reduce assumptions, and reinforce verification will be better positioned to reduce electrical risk and build safer, more resilient operations heading into 2026.
Continue the Conversation
OSHA trends are helpful, but what matters most is how your program holds up during real work. If you want to talk through what this looks like for your team, our experts can help you get clarity fast.
With best wishes for a safe and successful New Year,
